Search Ideas
780 ideas match your query.:
Done as of cc8e3e9. It now says ‘x unchanged lines collapsed’. See eg this activity.
Done as of a02e6c4, see eg this activity.
Would be neat linking to a specific activity.
Done as of cc8e3e9. It now says ‘x unchanged lines collapsed’.
Diffs should omit unchanged lines. Maybe just leave up to three lines around changed content for context – that’s how git does it.
Now that there are user profiles (#408), each profile can have a tab for unproblematic ideas. Among all the ideas a user has submitted, those are the ones he can rationally hold. And another tab for problematic ideas, ie ideas he has submitted that he cannot rationally hold.
Now that there are user profiles (#408), each profile can have a tab for unproblematic ideas. Among all the ideas a user has submitted, those are the ones he can rationally hold. And another tab for problematic ideas, ie ideas he cannot rationally hold.
There’s a bug where hovering over a link in the markdown preview removes the form and all typed text. Hovering over a link should have no effect on the form.
Done as of 8d3eed0, see eg the version history of #414.
Since the diff processes the text as a single line, the hunk header is always going to say either @@ -0,0 +1 @@ (for the first version) or @@ -1 +1 @@ (for every subsequent version). Meaning the header provides no real information. So I might as well remove it.
Since the diff processes the text as a single line, the diff information is always going to say either @@ -0,0 +1 @@ (for the first version) or @@ -1 +1 @@ (for every subsequent version). Meaning it provides no real information. So I might as well remove that part.
Done as of b3c06c4, see eg my profile.
There should be user profiles.
In activity feed, behind timestamp (‘… hours ago’), link to corresponding discussion.
As of 9702c05, a revision activity now says that the idea was either marked or unmarked as a criticism.
When a comment is a criticism on another criticism, the activity should say ‘So and so addressed criticism #…’
The activity feed just shows top-level criticisms as regular ideas. They should be shown as criticisms just like when they are child ideas.
Should probably show the explanation in a revision, when given. In the activity feed, that is.