Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


1806 ideas match your query.:

The activity feed already shows updates to discussions. Could just include changes to the privacy setting there. And, whenever the privacy setting does change, notify participants of the change.

#3118​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 10 months ago​·​Original #3109​·​CriticismArchived

On second thought, the reason for the privacy change may well be related to the reason for any changes to the title or about section, so doing it in the same notification might actually be clearer for users.

#3117​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

A change to the privacy setting is notable enough that it requires a dedicated notification independent of any changes to a discussion title or about section.

#3112​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Good call. I made the pagination ‘sticky’ as of 1e7a85d. Archiving this but let me know if something isn’t working right.

#3106​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Yeah I’d consider discipline irrational because it means one part of you coerces another.

Having said that, there could be value in learning how to deal productively with situations where you cannot avoid coercion. Like the government forcing you to do your taxes, which you will only do if you translate that external coercion into internal coercion. Nobody else can really coerce you, only you can coerce yourself. It would be nice to do this productively and also in a way that doesn’t practice/internalize self-coercion. And it should be rare. I don’t think basic chores qualify.

#3104​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago

In later implementations, I could maybe implement a ‘soft’ delete or grace period. Or I could keep the associated records and rely on authorization rules to prevent access. But as of right now, that’s a premature consideration.

#3102​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Those could be deleted when the user is removed.

#3100​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Have you seen: https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/core-objectivist-values

Might have some more virtues to include.

#3091​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago

This functionality is pretty standard across apps. You can be removed from Discord servers, Telegram channels, etc without warning or reason at any time. People generally know and accept this. If they still put in effort, that’s on them.

#3083​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

That depends on a bunch of factors, including their relationship with the discussion owner, into which Veritula has no visibility.

#3082​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

That risk could be clearly communicated in the UI.

#3080​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

Maybe you remove them because you don’t even want them to be able to see anything.

#3078​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

There’d probably be a bunch of edge cases with this approach. For example, others would still be able to comment on those ideas, and the comments would have to be hidden from OPs. Which begs the question of how that impacts the displayed criticism count… And so on.

#3077​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

If you later realize that adding someone was a mistake, you should be able to correct that mistake.

#3076​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​CriticismArchived

There could be hard cutoff: they lose access to everything, including their own ideas in that discussion.

#3072​·​Dennis HackethalOP, 10 months ago​·​Criticism Battle-testedArchived

We are also never the passive recipients of our knowledge; we are the creators.

Out of scope for fallibilism.

#3046​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

Some of those ideas are freedom, privacy, and free markets.

Out of scope for fallibilism.

#3045​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

This means that we can't be certain about anything, because we don't have a criterion of truth.

First sentence already implies this.

#3044​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

I’ve made dozens of pizzas by now. I’ve gotten pretty good at it.

Ingredients

  • Store-bought dough (312g)
  • Tomato sauce (70g, low sodium)
  • Mozzarella (whole milk, 100g – fresh will taste better but will also make the dough less crispy due to juices)
  • 2g extra virgin olive oil (optional)
  • Semolina flour

Then, for garnish:

  • Oregano
  • Fresh basil leaves
  • A dash of salt

Steps

  1. Preheat oven for 1 hour. Ends up somewhere around 450°F.
  2. Preheat pizza steel for 30 min on top rack underneath broiler, reaches about 650°F.
  3. In the meantime, rest dough on counter top until it reaches room temperature.
  4. Grate cheese and measure tomato sauce.
  5. Dust counter with semolina flour and stretch the dough. Make it thin so it gets crispy.
  6. Add tomato sauce.
  7. Place dough on peel.
  8. Place dough on steel; still on top rack with the broiler still on.
  9. Bake for 2 minutes.
  10. Take out to add cheese and oregano.
  11. Bake for another 1.5 minutes on top rack; again, the broiler is still on. Can turn it off halfway through if the pizza is burning on top but the center of the dough needs more time to bake.
  12. Optional: take out steel and let pizza rest on steel for another minute to make the bottom crispy.
  13. Optional: in the meantime, apply small amount of olive oil to the outer crust and sprinkle salt on outer crust. (Kind of overrated, not really worth the extra calories.)
  14. Remove from steel and serve.
#3041​·​Dennis HackethalOP revised 10 months ago​·​Original #1505

I don’t think animals are sentient.

I realize this view sounds outlandish to most but it’s a considered, researched conclusion.

There’s lots of evidence of insentience in the way animals behave. If they were sentient, they would not behave the way they do: https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/evidence-of-animal-insentience

Additional reasoning:
https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/animal-sentience-faq
https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/konrad-lorenz-hacked-animals
https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/animal-sentience-discussion-tree
https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/the-animal-rights-community-is-based-on-fear-a

#3039​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago

…the only known institutional mechanism for error-correction…

Not totally clear what error correction means in this context. Leadership change is only one example of error correction in politics. Maybe mention policy change as well?

#3038​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

"How can we structure our institutions so that we can remove bad rulers and bad policies without violence?".

The period at the end seems unnecessary.

#3037​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

It replaces…

What does ‘it’ refer to here? The concept of an open society? An open society itself? Subordination? The group? Grammatically, any of these could work!

#3036​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

It holds that there is no conclusive justification and no rational certainty for any belief.

First you speak of “every belief, theory, and observation”, then you speak only of belief. Some people may accidentally conclude that there can be rational certainty for theories and observations, just not for beliefs.

#3035​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism

[Fallibilism] is the philosophical position that all human knowledge … is … incomplete …

That doesn’t sound right. Potentially incomplete maybe. But you can reach perfection in some fields. You just can’t know with certainty that you’ve reached it.

https://blog.dennishackethal.com/posts/don-t-take-fallibilism-too-far

#3034​·​Dennis Hackethal, 10 months ago​·​Criticism