Search

Ideas that are…

Search ideas


1824 ideas match your query.:

Done as of 4922b8c. The form now sticks to the bottom of the discussion page.

#2772·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago·Criticism

You may want to hit the bell icon for each discussion and at the top of the page listing all discussions. Then you’ll be notified of every activity on existing discussions, and of new discussions.

#2770·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago

I think so. If Veritula did implement articles, the first thing I’d want is the ability to criticize them; to submit deeply nested counter-criticisms; and to render a label showing how many pending criticisms an article has, calculated based on criticism chains. Which is just what Veritula has already.

#2769·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago·Criticized1oustanding criticism

Right now, to get a good sense of an idea on Veritula, a user often has to study a branching discussion, which can take a lot of work depending on how the discussion played out.

While this is true for most existing discussions, it’s not a fundamental limitation of discussions in general. For example, ‘How Does Veritula Work?’ has several long-form posts without much discussion. It just depends on what kinds of posts people want to submit.

#2768·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago·CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism

Didn’t you want competing articles on some topic? In which case the same criticism applies to articles as well, unless I’m missing something.

#2767·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago·CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism

Top-level ideas in a discussion thread are not standalone pages.

Every idea (including every top-level one) has a separate, linkable page. You can reach it by clicking the link starting with the # sign.

#2766·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago·CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism

They can start a new discussion with as wide a topic as they want.

#2765·Dennis HackethalOP, 1 day ago·Criticism

No room for that, at least not on mobile.

#2764·Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago·Criticism

There could be a side pane that stays visible while scrolling content.

#2763·Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago·Criticized1oustanding criticism

There could be a floating button on the side that takes you to the bottom of the page.

#2762·Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago

https://veritula.com/ideas?q=&nature=uncontroversial is down from 2988ms to 476. Growing db should now have marginal effect, if any.

#2761·Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago·Criticism

Would ideas that no longer have pending criticisms (perhaps because the criticism chain has been flipped further down) be pulled out of the archive?

#2759·Benjamin Davies revised 2 days ago·Original #2740

further up

Further down

#2758·Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago·Criticism

Yes

#2757·Dennis HackethalOP, 2 days ago

Users may wish to publish articles that don’t neatly fit into a discussion topic.

#2756·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism

Top-level ideas need to be published to a specific discussion, which will cause some amount of silo-ing or similar dynamics.

#2755·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·Criticism

Idea: Veritula Articles

Currently, Veritula is a discussion website. I believe it could one day do what Wikipedia and Grokipedia do, but better.

A step towards that would be enabling users to produce ‘articles’ or something similar.

An ‘Articles’ tab would be distinct from the ‘Discussions’ tab, featuring explanatory documents similar to encyclopedia entries, and perhaps also blogpost-like content.

Articles focus on distilling the good ideas created/discovered in the discussions that occur on Veritula.

#2753·Benjamin Davies revised 3 days ago·Original #2750

Top-level ideas in a discussion thread are not standalone pages.

One thing that Wikipedia does well is having a structured, high level page for each idea/subject. This enables readers to get a good sense of an idea quickly.

Right now, to get a good sense of an idea on Veritula, a user often has to study a branching discussion, which can take a lot of work depending on how the discussion played out. A discussion also emphasises things that were relevant to the disagreements that took place in the discussion, rather than distilling the most important elements of an idea into a hierarchy, regardless of disagreements that took place in getting to it (like an encyclopedia entry does).

#2752·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·Criticism

‘Articles’ are functionally no different than top-level ideas in a discussion thread.

#2751·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·CriticismCriticized2oustanding criticisms

Idea: Veritula Articles

Currently, Veritula is a discussion website. I believe it could one day do what Wikipedia (and Grokipedia) do, but better.

A step towards that would be enabling users to produce ‘articles’ or something similar.

An ‘Articles’ tab would be distinct from the ‘Discussions’ tab, featuring explanatory documents similar to encyclopedia entries, and perhaps also blogpost-like content.

Articles focus on distilling the good ideas created/discovered in the discussions that occur on Veritula.

#2750·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·Criticized1oustanding criticism

It might make sense to have the new top-level idea form at the top, in the meantime. Compared to the current design, this would invite the creation of more top-level ideas.

#2749·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago

Any progress on this? Scrolling to the bottom to submit new ideas is annoying.

#2748·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago

Idea: Discussion specific activity feeds

#2747·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·Criticized1oustanding criticism

It would be a waste of time to add features that don’t scale well.

#2746·Benjamin Davies, 3 days ago·Criticism