Search

Ideas that are…

Search ideas


1201 ideas match your query.:

Agreed

#722·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago

I suppose not

#721·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago

Indeed

#720·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago

Gotcha

#719·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago

I suppose that too warrants an explanation.

#718·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago

I didn't know that. I figured linking to the tweet that posted it would be fine.

#717·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago·Criticized1oustanding criticism

How could I explain a term in the headline?

#716·Dirk Meulenbelt, 12 months ago

Superseded by #714. This comment was generated automatically.

#715·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

We will update you on news, events, and do longer form write-ups […]

‘longer-form’

[…] on the projects discussed in the talks, […]

You mentioned the talks in the previous sentence. Remove “discussed in the talks” and instead say ‘discussed projects’ or ‘projects that were discussed’.

[…] as we now have many more news sources we didn’t yet know about.

Don’t explain yourself to your readers. Remove this part.

#714·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Revision of #711·Criticism

Superseded by #712. This comment was generated automatically.

#713·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

Not a lawyer but reproducing the entire letter from Próspera ZEDE is presumably a violation of their copyright.

#712·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Revision of #699·Criticism

We will update you on news, events, and do longer form write-ups […]

‘longer-form’

[…] on the projects discussed in the talks, […]

You mentioned the talks in the previous sentence. Remove “discussed in the talks” and instead say ‘discussed projects’ or ‘projects that were discussed’.

as we now have many more news sources we didn’t yet know about.

Don’t explain yourself to your readers. Remove this part.

#711·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism

In the coming period, expect us to pick up on many of the talks’ subject matter.

False possessive

#710·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

Zu- series of popup projects

That hyphen looks out of place.

#709·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

The Honduran Supreme Court still needs to publish an explanatory addendum on the passed law to explain how (existing) ZEDEs will be dealt with after this ruling.

Passive voice hides accountability. Who will deal with ZEDEs? Use active voice accordingly.

#708·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

Prospects for Próspera and other ZEDEs look dire and in a recent post […]

The alliteration threw me off a bit here. And if they’re dire they’re not really prospects. ‘Outlook’ might work better here.

#707·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

lighter taxes and regulations

‘lower taxes and lighter regulations’ (I don’t think taxes can be ‘light’)

#706·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

achieved via allowing

‘by allowing’

#705·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

Superseded by #703. This comment was generated automatically.

#704·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

made […] legally possible

Just say ‘legalized’

#703·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Revision of #702·Criticism

legally possible

#702·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticized1oustanding criticism

Related to #700:

ZEDEs are SEZs in Honduras.

What are SEZs?

#701·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism

I now see that the newsletter links to an explanation further down:

ZEDEs are SEZs in Honduras.

But that’s too late. May have already lost readers at that point.

#700·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago

Not a lawyer but reproducing the entire letter from Próspera Zede is presumably a violation of their copyright.

#699·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·CriticismCriticized1oustanding criticism

Honduran Supreme Court declares ZEDEs unconstitutional, putting Próspera and other ZEDEs in jeopardy.

Not everyone knows what a “ZEDE” is. Is it an acronym? What does it stand for?

#698·Dennis HackethalOP, 12 months ago·Criticism