Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


63 ideas match your query.:

Yeah that's definitely a possible medical condition, e.g. in psychosis or after having ECT. Don't think it's the best explanation for Alzheimer's though, where the loss of brain volume is so apparent.

#2254·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago·Criticized1

Wait, do you view the pruning as separate from the mere competition of ideas, or simply its hardware consequences? In Darwinian evolution, competition and pruning are the same phenomena. Would expect the same for the mind.

#2253·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago·Criticized2

Hmm never thought of that, interesting! I think since the disease involves continuous loss of brain volume, harsware decay seems like the best explanation.

In general I think it makes sense to speak of diseases in neurology (e.g. Alzheimer's, Parkinsons, stroke) as bad hardware and psychiatric disease as bad software. But it could very well be that some of those diagnoses are miscategorised.

#2237·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago

That pruning mechanism is what constitutes natural selection in the mind.

#2235·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago·Criticized1

Makes sense, thanks Dennis. Constant pruning is the explanation that retains scarcity and competition, while making the brain seem to have much more memory than it does.

#2233·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago

Most people (except in Alzheimer's, etc.) don't run out of memory in the brain. If there's no scarcity for the space of ideas, why do they have to compete?

#2231·Erik Orrje revised 4 months ago·Original #2223·Criticized1

Of course, memory isn't infinite. But most people don't seem to run out of it in their lifetimes. Is it more accurate to say that ideas compete for working memory, which is scarcer?

#2225·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1

Most people (except in Alzheimer's, etc.) don't run out of memory in the brain. If there's no scarcity for the space of ideas, why do they have to compete?

#2223·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized3

Yeah, thanks! Are ideas also guesses of how to survive in the mind and across substrates, or is there more to ideas?

#2190·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago

Yeah (3) is interesting. Constructor theory is the contender I can think of for a future fifth strand. Any other suggestions?

#2090·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago

@dennis-hackethal, could you expand your argument in Lucas' blog post that self-similarity must entail correspondence?

#2032·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago

How do you think of "problems" for genes?

#2031·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago

Can't think of how it could be otherwise. Do you have any examples of inexplicit explanations?

#2030·Erik Orrje, 4 months ago