Objectivist Criticisms of Anarcho-Capitalism

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #11 and its comments.

See full discussion instead
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, over 1 year ago·#1· Collapse

The anarcho-capitalist stance: competing governments in a single territory would not only work but be superior to having a single government, a monopoly on violence.

Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, over 1 year ago·#10· Collapse

[There is a] difference between the functions of government and the functions of industry, between force and production.

Rand says ancaps make the same mistake as “modern statists” – they don’t see this difference.

Criticism of #1
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, over 1 year ago·#11· Collapse
1st of 2 versions

Defensive force and security services are productive endeavors.

Retaliatory force is only part thereof, and defense involves the employment of scarce resources, thus economic principles apply. (Logan Chipkin)

Criticism of #10Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, over 1 year ago·#12· Collapse

KodoKB points out a risk of abuse:

The use of retaliatory force has an objective risk of being misapplied and therefore of violating the rights of others.

Related: #4

Criticism of #11Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, over 1 year ago·#13· Collapse

A monopoly on violence amplifies the risk of abuse.

Criticism of #12
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago·#268· Collapse

Superseded by #267. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #11