Abortion

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #117.

See full discussion instead
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised about 1 year ago·#299· Collapse
3rd of 3 versions leading to #117

I’m pro abortion but I have some pro life in me.

Banning the abortion of a zygote seems ridiculous. So does aborting a seven-month-old fetus.

Why not go with: you can abort until the nervous system develops.

Clearly, an embryo without a nervous system can’t be sentient and thus can’t be a person, right? And as long as it’s not a person, it doesn’t have any rights.

According to https://www.neurosciencefoundation.org/post/brain-development-in-fetus, “an embryo’s brain and nervous system begin to develop at around the 6-week mark.” And: “At as early as 8 weeks (about 2 months), you can see physical evidence of the brain working (the electric impulses) as ultrasounds show the embryo moving.”

This idea is for viable pregnancies only. Other considerations may apply for non-viable ones.

Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP revised about 1 year ago·#146· Collapse
2nd of 2 versions leading to #117

While the fetus is attached to the mother, it’s her property and she is free to do what she wants with it. Therefore, she can abort the baby at any time prior to being born and the umbilical being cut, at which point the baby is an independent person.

(John)

Criticism of #299Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis HackethalOP, about 1 year ago·#117· Collapse

If the baby is a person, the mother has a responsibility to it. She can’t just be allowed to kill it. That makes no sense.

(Danny)

Criticism of #146