Copyright

Showing only those parts of the discussion which lead to #1348 and its comments.

See full discussion instead
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 6 months ago·#1336· Collapse

To keep someone from copying your work you have to infringe on the private property of that person by claiming an exclusive right on prohibiting his use of his privately owned copying medium to instantiate a certain pattern.

Criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

‘To stop someone from murdering you you have to infringe on his private property by claiming an exclusive right on prohibiting his use of his privately owned gun to shoot you’ How is that different?

Criticism of #1336Criticized1oustanding criticism
Amaro Koberle’s avatar
Amaro Koberle, 6 months ago·#1341· Collapse

Murdering someone destroys their scarce property (their body  in this case). Copying something using your own property leaves the original totally untouched.

Criticism of #1339
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
1st of 2 versions

Ridiculous definition of murder. Please cite a legal text where the definition of murder invokes scarce property.

Criticism of #1341Criticized1oustanding criticism
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

Superseded by #1350. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #1348