Jury Duty

Showing only those parts of the discussion that lead to #3348 and its comments.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies revised 15 days ago·#3339
Only version leading to #3348 (2 total)

Maybe juries can be done away with. Not all levels of courts have juries, so they mustn’t be fundamental.

Criticized1*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

mustn’t

Maybe this is the non-native speaker in me, but do you mean ‘can’t’? I thought ‘mustn’t’ means ‘may not’: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/must_not

Criticism of #3339Criticized1*
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies, 13 days ago·#3348
1st of 4 versions

This might be a difference in dialect. I mean ‘mustn’t’ as in ‘must not’.

Example sentence: “His shoes aren’t here. I guess he must not be home then.” —> “I guess he mustn’t be home then.”

This sentence is much more natural than “His shoes aren’t here. I guess he cannot be home then.”

Criticism of #3342Criticized2
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar

I mean ‘mustn’t’ as in ‘must not’.

I realize that. The linked Wiktionary page covers the contraction. The contraction isn’t the issue.

Criticism of #3348
Benjamin Davies’s avatar
Benjamin Davies, 11 days ago·#3364

Superseded by #3363. This comment was generated automatically.

Criticism of #3348