Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


2086 ideas match your query.:

The latter is still zero-sum because the author gets nothing in exchange for the work they put in upfront, but expected to get something, and made the distribution of their work contingent upon this expectation being fulfilled.

#2025·Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago·Criticism

The important thing is to be able to make predictions about images on the astronomers’ photographic plates, frequencies of spectral lines, and so on, and it simply doesn’t matter whether we ascribe these predictions to the physical effects of gravitational fields on the motion of planets and photons [as in pre-Einsteinian physics] or to a curvature of space and time.

Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology (p. 147), John Wiley, 1972. As quoted in chapter 1.

I’m getting conflicting results online for this quote. Some sources that quote the same passage say singular ‘effect’, others use the plural like Deutsch does.

I don’t have access to the original text, so I can’t say for sure if this is possibly a slight misquote or if different people are just quoting different editions.

#2014·Dennis Hackethal revised 4 months ago·Original #2011·Criticism

The important thing is to be able to make predictions about images on the astronomers’ photographic plates, frequencies of spectral lines, and so on, and it simply doesn’t matter whether we ascribe these predictions to the physical effects of gravitational fields on the motion of planets and photons [as in pre-Einsteinian physics] or to a curvature of space and time.

Steven Weinberg, Graviation and Cosmology (p. 147), John Wiley, 1972. As quoted in chapter 1.

I’m getting conflicting results online for this quote. Some sources that quote the same passage say singular ‘effect’, others use the plural like Deutsch does.

I don’t have access to the original text, so I can’t say for sure if this is possibly a slight misquote or if different people are just quoting different editions.

#2012·Dennis Hackethal revised 4 months ago·Original #2011·CriticismCriticized1

The important thing is to be able to make predictions about images on the astronomers’ photographic plates, frequencies of spectral lines, and so on, and it simply doesn’t matter whether we ascribe these predictions to the physical effects of gravitational fields on the motion of planets and photons [as in pre-Einsteinian physics] or to a curvature of space and time.

Steven Weinbert Graviation and Cosmology (p. 147), John Wiley, 1972. As quoted in chapter 1.

I’m getting conflicting results online for this quote. Some sources that quote the same passage say singular ‘effect’, others use the plural like Deutsch does.

I don’t have access to the original text, so I can’t say for sure if this is possibly a slight misquote or if different people are just quoting different editions.

#2011·Dennis Hackethal, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1

Any filtered idea should always display only the count of shown criticisms.

#2008·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1988·Criticized1Archived

Any filtered ideas should show a criticism label displaying n / m for the count, where n is the number of rendered criticisms and m is the number of total criticisms.

An explanation could accompany the n / m display, like a title on hover.

That way, there should never be any confusion as to a mismatch between the total vs rendered number of pending criticisms.

#2006·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1998·Criticized1Archived

How will people know what n / m means?

#2005·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismArchived

Any filtered ideas should show a criticism label displaying n / m for the count, where n is the number of rendered criticisms and m is the number of total criticisms.

That way, there should never be any confusion as to a mismatch between the total vs rendered number of pending criticisms.

#2003·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1998·Criticized2Archived

That could mislead people into thinking a revision has no pending criticisms, which would be bad for error correction.

#2001·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1989·CriticismCriticized1Archived

See #1999: “People could easily miss or forget that.”

#2000·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1Archived

People could easily miss or forget that.

#1999·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1Archived

Any filtered ideas should show a criticism label displaying n / m for the count, where n is the number of rendered criticisms and m is the number of total criticisms.

That way, there’s never any confusion as to 1) whether a filtered idea has any pending criticisms, 2) a filtered idea having more criticisms than are being rendered.

#1998·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·Criticized1Archived

See #1992: “The instructions at the top of the page are clear that not all ideas are being rendered.”

#1997·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismArchived

If no criticisms are being displayed, yet the label says an idea has n pending criticisms, that might confuse people. More generally, any mismatch between rendered vs counted criticisms could confuse people.

#1995·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1994·CriticismCriticized1Archived

If no criticisms are being displayed, yet the label says an idea has n pending criticisms, that might confuse people.

#1994·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1Archived

For all ideas, the total number of pending criticisms (if any) should always be shown, even if they are not all being rendered.

#1993·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·Archived

The instructions at the top of the page are clear that not all ideas are being rendered.

#1992·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismArchived

When cycling back to the revision, it should continue to display only the count of the shown criticisms.

#1990·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1988·Criticized1Archived

That could mislead people into thinking a revision has no pending criticisms.

#1989·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized2Archived

When cycling back to the revision, it should continue to display only the count of the shown criticisms.

#1988·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1Archived

Bug: when cycling through ‘filtered’ revisions (meaning there are more revisions that don’t lead to the highlighted idea), the criticism badge can change count for the same revision.

#1986·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #1985·CriticismCriticized2Archived

Bug: when cycling through ‘filtered’ revisions (meaning there are more revisions that don’t lead to the highlighted idea), the criticism badge can change count for the same idea.

#1985·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·CriticismCriticized1Archived

Hiccdown should have support for ids and class names in the tag symbol. Like Hiccup.

ruby
[:'div#my-id.my-class.another-class']
# => <div id="my-id" class="my-class another-class"></div>

It should also allow mixing:

ruby
[:'div#my-id.my-class.another-class', {id: 'override', class: 'additive'}]
# => <div id="override" class="my-class another-class additive"></div>

In other words, the id from the hash would override the id from the symbol, and the class from the hash would be added to the classes from the symbol.

#1984·Dennis HackethalOP, 4 months ago·Criticism

Hiccdown methods should live in their own, separate classes. How about they are called ‘displays’?

ruby
class ProductsDisplay
def index vc, # …
vc.some_helper_method
end
end

Behind the scenes, the Hiccdown gem would need to make the instance variables available to the display class:

ruby
display = @display_module.new
view_context.instance_variables.each do |iv|
display.instance_variable_set(
iv,
view_context.instance_variable_get(iv)
)
end

Then:

ruby
class ProductsDisplay
def index vc, # …
vc.some_helper_method(@products)
end
end
#1982·Dennis HackethalOP revised 4 months ago·Original #313·CriticismCriticized1Archived