Search

Ideas that are…

Search Ideas


403 ideas match your query.:

This might be a difference in dialect. I mean ‘mustn’t’ as in ‘must not’.

Example sentence: “His shoes aren’t here. I guess he must not be home then.” —> “I guess he mustn’t be home then.”

This sentence is much more natural than “His shoes aren’t here. I guess he cannot be home then.”

#3348·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized2

Maybe juries can be done away with. Not all levels of courts have juries, so they mustn’t be fundamental.

#3339·Benjamin Davies revised 2 months ago·Original #3338·Criticized1

Maybe juries can be done away with. Not all levels of courts have them, so they mustn’t be fundamental.

#3338·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·Criticized1

My charitable interpretation:

“Less and less possible” is a loose way of saying something like “more and more difficult to achieve”, or “occurs less and less often in the multiverse”.

#3289·Benjamin Davies revised 2 months ago·Original #3286·CriticismCriticized1

My charitable interpretation:

“Less and less possible” means something like “more and more difficult to achieve”, or “occurs less and less often in the multiverse”.

#3287·Benjamin Davies revised 2 months ago·Original #3286·CriticismCriticized1

My charitable interpretation:

“Less and less possible” means something like “more and more difficult to achieve”, or “a smaller and smaller occurrence in the multiverse”.

#3286·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized1

“([T]hey say)” presumably means he is paraphrasing people who get it wrong.

#3285·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized1

Why does neo-Darwinism qualify as a strand, if it can be understood as a component of Popperian epistemology?

#3284·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·Criticism

Economics is simply at the intersection of evolution and epistemology.

#3283·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·Criticism

While a lot of what’s involved in understanding a language is inexplicit, it is not possible to come to understand a language without ever dealing with it explicitly.

This is part of what separates explanatory knowledge from other types of knowledge.

#3281·Benjamin Davies revised 2 months ago·Original #3280·Criticism

While a lot of what’s involved in understanding a language is inexplicit, it is not possible to come to understand a language without ever dealing with it explicitly.

This is what separates explanatory knowledge from other types of knowledge.

#3280·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized1

… any replicator’s primary ‘concern’ is how to spread through the population at the expense of its rivals.

Why “at the expense of its rivals”? Isn’t the concern to spread at all, regardless of the outcome of rivals?

#3279·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized2

… any replicator’s primary ‘concern’ is how to spread through the population at the expense of its rivals.

Why “through the population”? Doesn’t this presuppose a replicator needs to exist within a population to do what it does? The first replicator spread with no population to spread into.

#3278·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized3

I am a life-long nail-biter. I am thinking a habit like nail-biting can be thought of as an addiction in this way.

I have a preference for letting my nails grow normally, and a preference for removing rough/uneven parts of my nails as soon as possible (which I often enact by biting my nails automatically/uncritically/mindlessly).

#3274·Benjamin Davies revised 2 months ago·Original #3183

Is “the refusal to ignore certain criticisms” not a case of treating ideas justly?

#3273·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago·Criticism

I’m having trouble with the idea that honesty is a prerequisite of rationality. This seems to imply honesty somehow comes before rationality.

I think it is more accurate to say rationality and honesty are interdependent, and from there you can deduce that rationality depends on honesty (in a way that maybe it doesn’t depend on justice).

#3272·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago·Criticism

I’ve asked Gemini to explain it:

1. Auto-Closure (Insertion State)

When the user inputs an opening delimiter, the system immediately injects the corresponding closing delimiter and places the caret (cursor) between them.

Input: (

Buffer State: (|)

Logic: insert(openingchar) + insert(closingchar) + move_caret(-1)

2. Type-Through (Escape State)

If the caret is positioned immediately before a closing delimiter that was autopaired, and the user types that specific closing delimiter, the system suppresses the character insertion and instead advances the caret.

Context: [text|]

Input: ]

Buffer State: [text]| (Not [text]])

Logic: if (nextchar == inputchar) { movecaret(+1); preventdefault(); }

3. Atomic Deletion (Regression State)

If the caret is between an empty pair of delimiters, a backspace event deletes both the opening and closing characters simultaneously, returning the buffer to the pre-insertion state.

Context: (|)

Input: Backspace

Buffer State: |

Logic: if (prevchar == open && nextchar == close) { delete_range(caret-1, caret+1); }

4. Selection Wrapping (Transformation State)

If a text range is selected (highlighted) and an opening delimiter is typed, the system wraps the selection rather than replacing it.

Context: |selected_text|

Input: [[

Buffer State: [[selected_text]]

Logic: surroundselection(inputpair)

5. Markdown-Specific Heuristics

Obsidian applies context-aware logic for Markdown syntax (e.g., * or _). It often checks word boundaries to determine if the user intends to bold/italicize or use a bullet point.

Context (Start of line): | + * + Space -> Bullet list (autopair disabled/consumed by formatting).

Context (Middle of line): word | + * -> word | (autopair enabled for italics).

#3271·Benjamin Davies, 2 months ago·CriticismCriticized1Archived

A place to live: Tunuyán or Tupungato districts, Mendoza, Argentina

#3257·Benjamin DaviesOP revised 2 months ago·Original #3244·Criticized4

Mendoza City, roughly 60–80 minutes away, has decent private hospitals (Hospital Español, Hospital Italiano). For Level 1 massive trauma, you might need a medical evacuation flight to Santiago (Chile) or Buenos Aires.

#3256·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago

Uco Valley is a high-trust agrarian bubble; violent crime is low, and neighbors look out for each other. Mendoza City (1 hour away) has standard Latin American urban crime risks (theft, robbery). You must maintain "situational awareness" when leaving your estancia.

#3255·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago

Corruption has historically been endemic, but the current administration is aggressively purging regulatory capture. However, legal enforcement can still be slow, and the judiciary is not fully independent of political winds.

#3254·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago·Criticism

The cultural and legal trend is rapidly moving away from "hate speech" regulation and towards US-style First Amendment interpretations.

#3253·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago

Milei's administration has authorized semi-automatic rifles for civilians again (reversing a ban) and streamlined the "Legitimate User" (CLU) process.

Pepper spray is legal and unregulated.

#3251·Benjamin DaviesOP revised 2 months ago·Original #3250

Milei's administration has authorized semi-automatic rifles for civilians again (reversing a ban) and streamlined the "Legitimate User" (CLU) process.

#3250·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago·Criticized1

Argentina is not a tax haven. Becoming a tax resident (living >12 months) triggers a Global Income Tax (Progressive up to 35%), and a Personal Assets Tax (Wealth Tax) on worldwide assets.

#3249·Benjamin DaviesOP, 2 months ago·Criticism